Alexis was 7 years and 10 months old when she was referred for help. She was in Grade 2 and had been diagnosed with ADHD, as well as auditory and visual-motor perceptual dysfunctioning by a psychologist, neurologist and occupational therapist. She had also received vision therapy.

In spite of some scatter amongst the scores of an IQ test, she still managed to fall within the superior range of intelligence. The school described her as a strong-willed child who struggled with a very short concentration span, and who was unable to sit still and listen or focus on her work due to distractibility. They considered her to be a very clever girl who was not reaching her potential.

On a modified Conner’s Rating Scale, her teacher gave her the highest rating of 3 (‘Very much’) for restlessness/overactive; excitable/impulsive; disturbing other children; failing to finish things/ daydreaming; constant fidgeting; temper outbursts/unpredictable behaviour; and a rating of 2 (‘Substantial’) for quick and drastic mood swings and frustration if demands are not instantly met. The neurologist had prescribed Ritalin and her teacher was very supportive of this.

During the evaluation, Alexis’ mother expressed the wish that Alexis could get along better with her friends and be less selfish and jealous. Alexis wanted to be able to concentrate better and complete tasks before going on to the next one, but showed a developing low self-esteem with her doubts that she would ever be able to do this or please everyone.

Background information

After a normal, easy pregnancy, Alexis’ birth had some complications. She was a big baby, weighing 4.21 kgs. After 3 hours of labour, she showed signs of distress so was delivered with the help of forceps. She had passed and inhaled some meconium in utero, which was suctioned from her lungs.

However, her APGAR scores were 8 and subsequent development was incident free, except that she did not have much movement stimulation as a baby. Her mother was content to leave her in her cot or carry her around in a baby chair for most of the early months. As long as there was something to look at, Alexis seemed to be happy to be mainly immobile.

She achieved normal motor milestones (crawling and walking) and early language development. After experiencing colic during the first three months, she was a healthy child with no ear infections or other significant illnesses.

From toddler days, she showed an ever-increasing liking for movement and constant activity. She enjoyed wild roundabout rides as well as running and jumping, and spent long times walking on her hands, which she mastered at 5 years. She also liked rocking on her school chair – backwards, forwards and sideways and did occasionally fall over. She went through phases of being clumsy, and got numerous bruises on her legs from bumping into chairs, walls, doors and even people. However, she was a slow starter in the mornings, showing little urgency to begin the day, and often spent a long time just gazing at herself in the bathroom mirror.

She was not an extremely restless sleeper but liked company in bed. She covered her head with her blankets when she slept. She was very sensitive to light and disliked sunlight, torchlight or waking up in the morning with her bedroom light burning.

She had a very sensitive scalp and thought that her fingertips were also very sensitive to touch – hating having her fingernails trimmed. She was extremely ticklish and disliked having anyone pretend to tickle her. Her favourite foods were salads and french fries or fish. She was not very fond of meat and particularly disliked the texture of chicken and some vegetables. She was very conscious of smells and seemed to be more sensitive to odours than most of her friends and family members.

Observations

Alexis did not move very much during the evaluation but soon expressed a liking for eyes-closed activities because she said that her eyes get tired very quickly. She showed some uneven saccadic movements when asked to follow a moving object with her eyes and also said that it made her dizzy. Her eyes could not converge easily at close distances either.

Low muscle tone was suspected when she displayed an untidy handwriting and also showed a preference for having her body supported by the chair or the desk. Her mother further supported the conclusion of low tone by commenting that Alexis was often rebuked for “slouching’.

She showed a dominant right hand and right eye and it seemed that her left brain hemisphere processed information more rapidly than the right. She used a technique known as ‘cognitive override’ to cope with demanding tasks. For example, she quickly used counting to help her master a finger tapping task.

When given an auditory task, Alexis had some difficulty accurately recalling syllables and she also forgot some details from a sentence read out to her.

Conclusions

Alexis’ sensitivity on her scalp and fingers and her ticklishness are indications that her sense of touch is irregular. This, coupled with a hypersensitivity to smell and light, can be very distracting to a child in a classroom. Her need to move, difficulty processing certain sounds, issues with visual tracking as well as her lowered muscle tone showed that her vestibular system was weak and unable to support the many functions for which it is responsible.

Her slow adjustment to the morning and her tendency to bump into things pointed to a weak sense of proprioception. Alexis’ vision was still compromised, in spite of vision therapy. Her light sensitivity and problems with tracking and convergence caused her to experience dizziness and headaches, and she preferred eyes-closed activities because they give her eyes a chance to rest. Because of poor proprioception, however, she found it necessary to depend on her eyes, which became increasingly strained.

Alexis needed a great amount of energy to sustain her weakened systems during the day and her short temper and frustrations were making it hard for her to maintain interpersonal relationships. One reason why she found it difficult to attend to language and directions from others is that their words interfered with her own thoughts through which she was directing her movement.

In spite of the problems Alexis was experiencing with so many irregular systems, she had been compensating well. She was thus using her superior intellect to her advantage, but she did not have the underlying support systems for focussing and sustaining her attention flexibly and for completing tasks. These were leading to distress in her relationships with schoolwork as well as with friends and adults and ultimately to her failure to realise her potential.

Recommendations

The program designed for Alexis concentrated on activities to strengthen weak underlying functions and to enhance the connections among the various functions. Her program included several activities to strengthen her vestibular system. These, as well as the special massage that was recommended to reduce Alexis’ hypersensitivity to touch, were also targeting her muscle tone issues, to help strengthen this crucial function.

Other simple, non-taxing activities were suggested to strengthen her visual functions and reduce her light sensitivity, without stressing her weak vestibular system or relying on muscle tone and differentiation of eye movements from head movements. One of these was drinking through the “loopy straw” with its many loops and small diameter. Alexis was also encouraged to supplement her diet with omega-3 fatty acids, to ensure myelination of those neural pathways which the exercises were creating and strengthening.

Follow-up

Alexis’ initial assessment took place in September. By late in November, her mother reported encouraging progress. Alexis was beginning to make friends with girls with similar intellectual interests as her own as was coping better socially, with less aggression. She also showed an improvement in her manners and behaviour at school and home.

According to reports from the school, she was sitting still and finishing her work, and this improvement was substantiated by the school awarding her certificates of excellence. They no longer thought Ritalin was necessary.

Alexis is continuing her ILT programme. It is gratifying that the improved ability to focus and sustain tasks has already helped to reverse her lowered self-esteem. She now feels proud of who she is and is rapidly forgetting that she was ever labelled as having ADHD and related learning problems.

Martin Doherty, writing for The Conversation, says that at the age of about four, children reach important milestones in brain development.

One of these is a huge improvement in understanding others’ thoughts and feelings. This is the start of empathy.  Another is in spatial thinking—understanding how objects are positioned and related. This is the beginning of the ability to read maps.

Martin and his colleague, Catherine Sayer, conducted a study with 175 two to five-year-olds to explore how children are able to use scale models to figure out where something is in the real world. At about four, children are able to use a scale model of a room to work out where something is. We thought that this might result from children’s understanding of how one thing can represent something else. But we actually found that four-year-olds’ ability to use scale models came from their spatial abilities.

At the same age, children start to understand that someone’s behaviour is due to what that person believes, not necessarily what is really the case. This has interesting consequences.

If you’ve played hide-and-seek with young children, you may have noticed that they aren’t always very good at it. They love the ritual of looking in all the wrong places first, but beforehand they may tell you where they are going to hide, hide in the same place every time, or not be especially hidden.

After their fourth birthday, they get much better at hide and seek. They understand that the seeker looks in the wrong places because they don’t know where the hider is.

At about three to four children also start to tell lies. They realize they can make someone believe something that isn’t true.

Understanding symbols

Martin’s earlier research with fellow psychologist Josef Perner suggests that four-year-olds don’t just start to understand how others’ minds work. Figuring this out is part of the development of an understanding of “representation”—that symbols, like thoughts, words, or pictures, can be used to stand for something else.

Children start to think about how words relate to objects. This means, for instance, knowing that “animal” can refer to something you already have a name for, such as “rabbit”. This might help children learn the new word.

Their ability to use a understand the components of pictures also improves around this age. Very young children use a lot of trial and error to complete a jigsaw, picking up random pieces to see if they fit. By the time they are about four years old, they start to use the picture as a guide, trying to connect lines and match bits of colour, while checking the guide picture on the box lid.

Developmental experiments

Another ability children develop at around four is using scale models. A classic set of developmental experiments involved a model of a regular household room. The real room had typical furniture—sofa, table, cupboard and so on—and the model had miniature versions laid out in the same way.

Children were shown where something was hidden in the model and told to find an object hidden in “the same place” in the room. Children of around four can find the object using the identical layouts. If shown a sticker under a particular chair in the model room, for example, they can go straight to the “same” chair in the other room. This is the fundamental understanding required to read maps.

Adults see scale models and maps as representations. Maps represent a town or a country. A scale model of, say, the Eiffel Tower represents the real thing. At first, Martin suspected children’s ability to use scale models is more evidence of understanding representation at this age.

He was wrong. Instead, the researchers found that this ability is based on a development in children’s spatial abilities that also occurs at about four. This is the ability to think about spaces and where objects are within them. Spatial abilities help with maths skills, and good spatial ability is linked to an interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Their experiment was simple. They compared the model room task with a test of understanding how representation works. The two abilities develop around the same age, but they found they were not related. Children who could do one task couldn’t necessarily do the other.

They also had a test of purely spatial ability. Children who passed the model room task also passed the spatial task. So it looks like the model room task relied on children‘s spatial thinking.

They don’t yet know why two important but apparently unrelated abilities arise at the same time. Perhaps it’s related to changes in the growing brain at this  interesting age.

Provided by The Conversation

Image supplied by Freepik.