It’s hard being a parent in today’s world.  It’s also hard being a teacher. They have to deal with classroom conditions that make it difficult to teach effectively.  For this reason, we can’t blame them too harshly for looking for labels that match certain difficult behaviours in children and that result in help from other professionals in controlling the behaviour.

The most common label emerging in recent years is that of ‘ADHD’.  Many medical and mental health practitioners find that there is a lack of evidence to support the actual existence of this mental disorder.  It is difficult to justify the validity of an ADHD diagnosis because there are no tests to ‘prove’ it exists.  In spite of this, it remains the term of choice to use when children fail to behave as they should in an educational setting.

There is another side to the coin – one that does not rely on snap judgements by medical practitioners or well-meaning but unknowing teachers.  Children don’t need diagnoses.  Children who have problems with attention, organization, hyperactivity and learning difficulties don’t need to be treated as suffering from disorders.  They don’t need to be stigmatized by labels and poisoned by drugs that suppress their symptoms and do harm to their systems.  They need real help to feel and function well.

The underlying causes of the symptoms of ADHD are many.   Several children may carry this label because their behaviours tick the same boxes but they may have very different reasons for behaving the way they do.  Very often there are neurodevelopmental irregularities leading to immature brain areas; there may be nutritional deficiencies affecting the brain and body; poor gut health directly impairs brain functioning; emotional factors may play a role; environmental offenders such as heavy metals might be part of the picture.   Nothing stands alone, so sometimes we don’t find a single, simple cause but have to address the problem holistically.

So don’t believe blindly in the ADHD label.    We can see how children are behaving, just as we can see the tip of an iceberg.  What isn’t obvious is what lies beneath the surface.  Before allowing our children to be diagnosed with a mental disorder and treated accordingly with a potentially dangerous drug be prepared to look deeper.

Image supplied by Freepik.

Martin Doherty, writing for The Conversation, says that at the age of about four, children reach important milestones in brain development.

One of these is a huge improvement in understanding others’ thoughts and feelings. This is the start of empathy.  Another is in spatial thinking—understanding how objects are positioned and related. This is the beginning of the ability to read maps.

Martin and his colleague, Catherine Sayer, conducted a study with 175 two to five-year-olds to explore how children are able to use scale models to figure out where something is in the real world. At about four, children are able to use a scale model of a room to work out where something is. We thought that this might result from children’s understanding of how one thing can represent something else. But we actually found that four-year-olds’ ability to use scale models came from their spatial abilities.

At the same age, children start to understand that someone’s behaviour is due to what that person believes, not necessarily what is really the case. This has interesting consequences.

If you’ve played hide-and-seek with young children, you may have noticed that they aren’t always very good at it. They love the ritual of looking in all the wrong places first, but beforehand they may tell you where they are going to hide, hide in the same place every time, or not be especially hidden.

After their fourth birthday, they get much better at hide and seek. They understand that the seeker looks in the wrong places because they don’t know where the hider is.

At about three to four children also start to tell lies. They realize they can make someone believe something that isn’t true.

Understanding symbols

Martin’s earlier research with fellow psychologist Josef Perner suggests that four-year-olds don’t just start to understand how others’ minds work. Figuring this out is part of the development of an understanding of “representation”—that symbols, like thoughts, words, or pictures, can be used to stand for something else.

Children start to think about how words relate to objects. This means, for instance, knowing that “animal” can refer to something you already have a name for, such as “rabbit”. This might help children learn the new word.

Their ability to use a understand the components of pictures also improves around this age. Very young children use a lot of trial and error to complete a jigsaw, picking up random pieces to see if they fit. By the time they are about four years old, they start to use the picture as a guide, trying to connect lines and match bits of colour, while checking the guide picture on the box lid.

Developmental experiments

Another ability children develop at around four is using scale models. A classic set of developmental experiments involved a model of a regular household room. The real room had typical furniture—sofa, table, cupboard and so on—and the model had miniature versions laid out in the same way.

Children were shown where something was hidden in the model and told to find an object hidden in “the same place” in the room. Children of around four can find the object using the identical layouts. If shown a sticker under a particular chair in the model room, for example, they can go straight to the “same” chair in the other room. This is the fundamental understanding required to read maps.

Adults see scale models and maps as representations. Maps represent a town or a country. A scale model of, say, the Eiffel Tower represents the real thing. At first, Martin suspected children’s ability to use scale models is more evidence of understanding representation at this age.

He was wrong. Instead, the researchers found that this ability is based on a development in children’s spatial abilities that also occurs at about four. This is the ability to think about spaces and where objects are within them. Spatial abilities help with maths skills, and good spatial ability is linked to an interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Their experiment was simple. They compared the model room task with a test of understanding how representation works. The two abilities develop around the same age, but they found they were not related. Children who could do one task couldn’t necessarily do the other.

They also had a test of purely spatial ability. Children who passed the model room task also passed the spatial task. So it looks like the model room task relied on children‘s spatial thinking.

They don’t yet know why two important but apparently unrelated abilities arise at the same time. Perhaps it’s related to changes in the growing brain at this  interesting age.

Provided by The Conversation

Image supplied by Freepik.