Mary Mountstephen is well known for her work in education. Visit her website www.marymountstephen.com to learn about her achievements and the help she offers to children with special needs.  She recently posted the results of a study she did to determine whether exercise can really impact on performance in the classroom and, if so, what type of exercise is more effective? Here is a summary of her findings.

Much of the research to date has focused on aerobic movement programmes. These place emphasis on general health rather than the impact that physical activity may have on the workings of the mind. It seems that there is now growing interest in researching the use of a wider range of movement interventions that combine different types of activities to address specific needs.

Some of these activities include

– Yoga, with links between improved focus and executive functioning. Some research shows that two 60-minute sessions of yoga over a 20-week period brought improvements in ADHD type symptoms.

– Martial arts, which offers a structured approach that requires a combination of cognitive and motor approaches. This helps to increase attention, focus and self-control.

– Floor-based motor programmes, focusing on neurodevelopmental immaturities such as retained primitive reflexes have also shown potential to improve attentiveness and hyperactivity. Integrated Learning Therapy (ILT) and Move to Learn are examples of approaches using this type of programme as part of their therapeutic intervention.

Combining aerobic activities with less strenuous movements can produce improvements in cognitive flexibility, working memory and inhibitory control. This is why schools are encouraged to allow children to perform aerobic exercise during the school day for a temporary enhancement of executive functioning, needed to focus, complete tasks and generally learn.  Parents too can use this information. Encourage your child to join a class of yoga or martial arts, do some form of aerobic exercise (skipping is an excellent activity needing a small space outdoors) before homework or study time, and consider help for determining whether a child’s challenges with ADHD-type symptoms may be due to developmental immaturities.

 

Martin Doherty, writing for The Conversation, says that at the age of about four, children reach important milestones in brain development.

One of these is a huge improvement in understanding others’ thoughts and feelings. This is the start of empathy.  Another is in spatial thinking—understanding how objects are positioned and related. This is the beginning of the ability to read maps.

Martin and his colleague, Catherine Sayer, conducted a study with 175 two to five-year-olds to explore how children are able to use scale models to figure out where something is in the real world. At about four, children are able to use a scale model of a room to work out where something is. We thought that this might result from children’s understanding of how one thing can represent something else. But we actually found that four-year-olds’ ability to use scale models came from their spatial abilities.

At the same age, children start to understand that someone’s behaviour is due to what that person believes, not necessarily what is really the case. This has interesting consequences.

If you’ve played hide-and-seek with young children, you may have noticed that they aren’t always very good at it. They love the ritual of looking in all the wrong places first, but beforehand they may tell you where they are going to hide, hide in the same place every time, or not be especially hidden.

After their fourth birthday, they get much better at hide and seek. They understand that the seeker looks in the wrong places because they don’t know where the hider is.

At about three to four children also start to tell lies. They realize they can make someone believe something that isn’t true.

Understanding symbols

Martin’s earlier research with fellow psychologist Josef Perner suggests that four-year-olds don’t just start to understand how others’ minds work. Figuring this out is part of the development of an understanding of “representation”—that symbols, like thoughts, words, or pictures, can be used to stand for something else.

Children start to think about how words relate to objects. This means, for instance, knowing that “animal” can refer to something you already have a name for, such as “rabbit”. This might help children learn the new word.

Their ability to use a understand the components of pictures also improves around this age. Very young children use a lot of trial and error to complete a jigsaw, picking up random pieces to see if they fit. By the time they are about four years old, they start to use the picture as a guide, trying to connect lines and match bits of colour, while checking the guide picture on the box lid.

Developmental experiments

Another ability children develop at around four is using scale models. A classic set of developmental experiments involved a model of a regular household room. The real room had typical furniture—sofa, table, cupboard and so on—and the model had miniature versions laid out in the same way.

Children were shown where something was hidden in the model and told to find an object hidden in “the same place” in the room. Children of around four can find the object using the identical layouts. If shown a sticker under a particular chair in the model room, for example, they can go straight to the “same” chair in the other room. This is the fundamental understanding required to read maps.

Adults see scale models and maps as representations. Maps represent a town or a country. A scale model of, say, the Eiffel Tower represents the real thing. At first, Martin suspected children’s ability to use scale models is more evidence of understanding representation at this age.

He was wrong. Instead, the researchers found that this ability is based on a development in children’s spatial abilities that also occurs at about four. This is the ability to think about spaces and where objects are within them. Spatial abilities help with maths skills, and good spatial ability is linked to an interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Their experiment was simple. They compared the model room task with a test of understanding how representation works. The two abilities develop around the same age, but they found they were not related. Children who could do one task couldn’t necessarily do the other.

They also had a test of purely spatial ability. Children who passed the model room task also passed the spatial task. So it looks like the model room task relied on children‘s spatial thinking.

They don’t yet know why two important but apparently unrelated abilities arise at the same time. Perhaps it’s related to changes in the growing brain at this  interesting age.

Provided by The Conversation

Image supplied by Freepik.